{"id":13607,"date":"2024-03-13T11:47:36","date_gmt":"2024-03-13T11:47:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/agiliway.com\/?p=13607"},"modified":"2024-03-27T11:51:53","modified_gmt":"2024-03-27T11:51:53","slug":"microservice-architecture-in-action-how-to-build-a-scalable-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/agiliway.com\/microservice-architecture-in-action-how-to-build-a-scalable-system\/","title":{"rendered":"Microservice Architecture in Action: How to Build a Scalable System?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Imagine building a system so efficient it practically runs itself. That’s the goal for many businesses, and this client was no different. But the path to optimal architecture took an unexpected turn, leading them from the allure of serverless to the power of microservices.<\/p>\n

This article discusses how the Agiliway team helped to build a complex system utilizing multiple DevOps tools<\/a> and strategies to ensure that the client received a system that was not only efficient but also secure and scalable.<\/p>\n

Serverless is Great but Not Always Suitable<\/h2>\n

The client initially set their sights on a serverless architecture, an approach where code is executed in response to events without the need for traditional server management. Serverless is attractive because you only pay for what you use, a perfect fit for businesses with fluctuating workloads. However, as they dug deeper, a different story emerged.<\/p>\n

One of the main advantages of serverless computing is its inherent scalability. The burden of provisioning and managing servers falls on the cloud provider, allowing businesses to focus on development. However, for this client, the anticipated workload involved millions of function executions per month. While serverless scales automatically, the cost implications for such a high volume became a major concern. Each function invocation incurs a small cost, and with millions triggered monthly, the serverless bill could quickly balloon.<\/p>\n

Beyond the cost factor, operational complexity also started to outweigh the initial appeal. Managing a vast network of individual functions spread across the serverless landscape can be challenging. Debugging issues, monitoring performance, and maintaining consistent code deployments across these functions can become a time-consuming and resource-intensive task.<\/p>\n

Microservices are Efficient and on a Budget<\/h3>\n

A shift towards microservices \u2013 smaller, independent services working together \u2013 proved to be a game-changer in terms of costs:<\/p>\n